The society was established and named after Pope Pius X by the controversial French archbishop Marcel Lefebvre. He was an adherent to the uncompromising positions Pius (who reigned from 1903 to 1914) held against \u201cmodernism\u201d \u2013 the attempts by some Catholics to apply contemporary intellectual and moral trends to the teachings of the church.<\/p>\n
In 1907, Pius X had declared<\/a> modernism to be an attack on all elements of the church by those who \u201cvaunt themselves as reformers\u201d. <\/p>\n Those who joined the SSPX reacted specifically to reforms brought about within the church by the Second Vatican Council (often known as Vatican II).<\/p>\n Convened between 1962 and \u201965, Vatican II was reportedly described by Pope John XXIII as an attempt to \u201copen the windows and let in the fresh air\u201d. It sought to recognise the rapidly shifting world of the 20th century, and reaffirm<\/a> the role of the church in guiding Catholics by interpreting these events \u201cin the light of the Gospel\u201d. <\/p>\n Many reforms occurred within the church as a result, including the introduction of worship in vernacular languages, replacing the older Latin Mass (often referred to as the \u201cTridentine Mass\u201d, as it was standardised after the Council of Trent<\/a> in the 16th century). <\/p>\n Lefebvre and his supporters saw this as a Modernist revolution<\/a>. But they were the ones who came under suspicion for this divergence in such important matters of dogma. In 1975, the society was \u201csuppressed\u201d, meaning it was no longer recognised by the Church as legitimate. <\/p>\n This proved the start of a much longer struggle, as members of the SSPX continued to act regardless of instruction from the Holy See.<\/p>\n In 1976, Pope Paul VI described<\/a> Lefebvre and his movement as suffering from \u201ca bitter deafness\u201d which had placed them \u201coutside of obedience and communion with the Successor of Peter and therefore of the Church\u201d. He implored them to \u201creflect calmly, without prejudice\u201d and \u201cto become aware of the deep wounds they otherwise cause the Church\u201d. <\/p>\n \u201cWe invite them again to think,\u201d he concluded. But his appeal appeared to fall on deaf ears. <\/p>\n The struggle between the SSPX and the Vatican boiled over in 1988 when \u2013 as at the ceremony a few days ago \u2013 four priests were consecrated as bishops at \u00c9c\u00f4ne. The event occurred despite a warning from John Paul II, and resulted in the excommunication of Lefebvre and the four bishops. <\/p>\n The pope viewed<\/a> the act as a grave disobedience not only against his authority, but \u201cthe unity of the Church\u201d. <\/p>\n But as a concession, he acknowledged the \u201cfeelings of all those who are attached to the Latin liturgical tradition\u201d, and opened a commission<\/a> to attempt to return those in the SSPX to the church while \u201cpreserving their spiritual and liturgical traditions\u201d. <\/p>\n An acknowledgement of a wider conservative desire to retain the Latin Mass and the forms of worship used before Vatican II came in 2007, when Pope Benedict XVI decreed<\/a> that these older forms could be celebrated under specific conditions.<\/p>\n Two years later, Benedict lifted the excommunication of the four bishops from 1988, believing a productive dialogue had emerged. Talks continued between the SSPX and the Vatican in the hope of achieving a reconciliation.<\/p>\n In 2012, however, the Vatican declared: \u201cWe cannot put the Catholic faith at the mercy of negotiations. Compromise does not exist in this field. I think that there can now be no new discussions.\u201d<\/p>\n Discussions did in fact continue during the papacy of Francis, but the SSPX was considered to have \u201cdeparted from communion with the Church\u201d. Archbishop Gerhard M\u00fcller, head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith which decides matters of doctrine, said that \u201cthey must change their attitude and accept the Catholic Church\u2019s conditions\u201d.<\/p>\n The decision by Leo XIV to excommunicate the SSPX follows several months of warnings from the Vatican<\/a> not to proceed with the consecration of the new bishops.<\/p>\n In a letter addressed to Father Davide Pagliarani, superior general of the SSPX on June 30, Leo wrote: \u201cI urge you to consider carefully the spiritual good of the faithful, because the schismatic act you are about to undertake would deprive them of the licit and, in some cases, even valid reception of the Sacraments, which they love and seek for their sanctification.\u201d<\/p>\n But the SSPX proceeded and the pope has acted.<\/p>\n This episode reflects the considerable tension among conservative Catholics over the reforms of Vatican II. While the size of the SSPX is tiny compared with the global number of Catholics (some 600,000 members in a global community of 1.4 billion<\/a>), the polarisation of opinions within the church are arguably of a much larger scale.<\/p>\nA Church divided<\/h2>\n
![\"The](\"https:\/\/counter.theconversation.com\/content\/286775\/count.gif\")
<\/p>\n