{"id":789,"date":"2026-06-17T16:51:17","date_gmt":"2026-06-17T16:51:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/redzine.co.uk\/index.php\/2026\/06\/17\/what-makes-the-ideal-digital-icon-a-psychologist-explains\/"},"modified":"2026-06-17T16:51:17","modified_gmt":"2026-06-17T16:51:17","slug":"what-makes-the-ideal-digital-icon-a-psychologist-explains","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/redzine.co.uk\/index.php\/2026\/06\/17\/what-makes-the-ideal-digital-icon-a-psychologist-explains\/","title":{"rendered":"What makes the ideal digital icon? A psychologist explains"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/span> wavebreakmedia\/Shutterstock<\/a><\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Digital icons are everywhere \u2013 and usually, we interpret these visual symbols in the blink of an eye. Who today doesn\u2019t know that a wastebasket means \u201cdelete\u201d and a magnifying glass means \u201csearch\u201d?<\/p>\n

Yet icons\u2019 meanings can be deeply shaped by culture, experience and technological history. So what seems obvious to one person may be confusing to another.<\/p>\n

They were originally designed to make computers look friendlier and less intimidating to the few people who had access to them. For example, the icons below first appeared in 1975 in the Pygmalion<\/a> visual programming system.<\/p>\n

Years later, they attained much wider visibility thanks to the Xerox Star 8010<\/a>, a pioneering office computer that introduced many graphic interface concepts that are still used today.<\/p>\n

\n \"Alt<\/a>
\n The Xerox 8010 Star\u2019s icons.<\/span>
\n stardock.com<\/a><\/span>
\n <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Research my colleagues and I conducted<\/a> examines how people perceive, understand and evaluate digital icons \u2013 including which visual characteristics make icons easier to learn and use<\/a>. Pygmalion\u2019s pioneering icons worked because they relied on existing knowledge of the office world.<\/p>\n

This meant they reduced cognitive effort<\/a> by relying on recognition rather than recall. The icons looked like the physical objects they were representing \u2013 and critically, objects the computer\u2019s users were already familiar with.<\/p>\n

Five secrets of a good icon<\/h2>\n

The designer Susan Kare, creator of many of the original Macintosh icons<\/a>, said a good icon should either be instantly recognisable or so easy to remember that a user only needs to learn it once.<\/p>\n

To Kare, designing icons was about solving \u201cthe little puzzle of making an image fit a metaphor\u201d. More than 40 years later, that challenge remains.<\/p>\n

Research, including work by my colleagues and me<\/a>, suggests the most successful icons tend to share key characteristics that guide us from seeing to understanding almost instantaneously. Here are five of them.<\/p>\n

1. They depict things we already know<\/strong> <\/p>\n

Early computer icons worked because they borrowed from the office world that people already knew: folders, bins, documents, calculators, floppy disks. Psychologists refer to those as \u201cconcrete\u201d icons<\/a> because people to use their knowledge of the everyday world to interpret them.<\/p>\n

However, only a limited number of functions can be represented as identifiable objects, and getting a close fit between pictures and functions is not always easy. The more complex the meaning becomes, the harder it is to design concrete icons. <\/p>\n

To test this, can you guess the meaning of these four icons? (Answers at the end of the article.)<\/p>\n

\n \"Alt<\/a>
\n Icon credits:<\/span>
\n Freepik\/Flaticon; Kartini 1\/The Noun Project; Elzicon\/Flaticon; IconPai\/The Noun Project.<\/a><\/span>
\n <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

2. They mean what we think they mean<\/strong> <\/p>\n

Psychologists talk about \u201csemantic distance\u201d \u2013 how closely an image matches its intended meaning. An abstract symbol for \u201cprivacy settings\u201d or \u201ccloud syncing\u201d has a much larger semantic distance than using a bin to mean \u201cdelete\u201d.<\/p>\n

As digital functions become more complex, designing icons that communicate their meaning quickly becomes increasingly difficult.<\/p>\n

3. They feel familiar<\/strong> <\/p>\n

Another important feature of successful icons is consistency of use over time \u2013 which leads to familiarity. The icons shown below are widely used even though the objects depicted are no longer so widely in use. This highlights the point that icons are partly informative signs and partly shared learned conventions, whose success is based on collective familiarity.<\/p>\n

Take the floppy disk \u201csave\u201d icon (below left). Younger users recognise the meaning without ever having seen the physical object that the icon originally represented. The same is true of traditional telephone handsets and perhaps even envelopes (now widely used to denote \u201cemail\u201d). While the objects have been superseded, the icons remain.<\/p>\n

\n \"Alt<\/a>
\n <\/span>
\n Icon credits: Yogi Aprelliyanto\/Flaticon<\/a><\/span>
\n <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

4. They look good<\/strong> <\/p>\n

A well-designed object can have a positive effect on our behaviour \u2013 and the digital world is no different. Well-designed icons are more likely to attract downloads<\/a>, help us perform tasks more efficiently<\/a>, and learn better and faster<\/a>. They even make digital environments feel more pleasant to use<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Think of the difference between an app icon that feels cluttered and amateurish and one that looks clean, balanced and professional. Even before we know what the app does, the icon\u2019s design can influence expectations of how well the app will work<\/a>.<\/p>\n

5. They are tested with real users<\/strong> <\/p>\n

Although icons and symbols are on the rise as a global visual language, it\u2019s important not simply to assume that icons work globally \u2013 and to understand what makes a good digital icon across languages, cultures, ages and digital experiences.<\/p>\n

This is why the International Standards Organisation<\/a> (ISO 9186) demands comprehensibility testing \u2013 because symbols should be understood without explanatory text whenever possible.<\/p>\n

A bridge between perception and meaning<\/h2>\n

As we spend more of our lives in digitally mediated environments, icons do two jobs simultaneously. They help us interact with technology more efficiently, and shape how we feel about the experience.<\/p>\n

A digital icon is not simply a small picture. It is a bridge between perception and meaning. The best icons make interfaces feel less intimidating, more intuitive and more approachable \u2013 creating a global visual language that crosses barriers of language and culture.<\/p>\n

In other words, good icons do more than help us find our way around a digital world. They help make that world feel understandable, welcoming and human.<\/p>\n

Icon quiz answers: 1. cloud syncing; 2. privacy settings; 3. algorithmic recommendations; 4. generative AI.<\/em><\/p>\n

\"The<\/p>\n

Irene Reppa does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

wavebreakmedia\/Shutterstock Digital icons are everywhere \u2013 and usually, we interpret these visual symbols in the blink of an eye. Who today doesn\u2019t know that a wastebasket means \u201cdelete\u201d and a magnifying glass means \u201csearch\u201d? Yet icons\u2019 meanings can be deeply shaped by culture, experience and technological history. So what seems obvious to one person may […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-789","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/redzine.co.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/789","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/redzine.co.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/redzine.co.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/redzine.co.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/redzine.co.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=789"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/redzine.co.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/789\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/redzine.co.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=789"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/redzine.co.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=789"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/redzine.co.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=789"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}