![\"Aerial](\"https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/737612\/original\/file-20260522-57-6fvlgi.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.0&q=45&auto=format&w=1000&fit=clip\")
<\/a>\n Jose Iriarte<\/span>, CC BY-SA<\/a><\/span>
\n <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
If you stand on the open savannah, there is almost nothing to see of this ancient network. The horizon feels open, with fires in the distance from local people burning pastures and clearing forest as dry season begins. The old geometry is still faintly perceptible, but you have to know how to look. <\/p>\n
Step into the patches of forest and the canopy closes in. The earth softens underfoot and mosquitoes descend in relentless swarms. The sweat on your neck thickens into a humid film, carrying the familiar scent of suncream and the sharper, chemical note of DEET. <\/p>\n
In the uneven light between the trees, the landscape dissolves into subtle rises and depressions. Against the rhythmic swish of machetes as our guides cut through the vegetation, your mind tries to piece together the fragments of structures into something coherent. Flying overhead doesn\u2019t reveal anything about this forest area in the way that it does with the savannah. But fortunately recent advances in technology have transformed what we are able to see. <\/p>\n Archaeological explorations in this part of the world have been completely changed by lidar in the past couple of decades. Lidar maps an area from a plane or drone by bouncing rapid laser pulses off the Earth\u2019s surface. Some of these pulses penetrate the forest canopy, reach the ground and reflect back to the sensor. <\/p>\n By measuring the return time, the system can generate highly precise three-dimensional models of the terrain. This allows you to strip away the camouflage of vegetation, making it possible to see what lies below the Amazonian forest for the first time. <\/p>\n It reveals the ancient Llanos de Moxos as not simply a collection of settlements, but an entire urbanised landscape<\/a>. A large part in the south-east of this region belonged to the Casarabe culture, which dominated between around AD500 and 1400. It extends across 20,000km\u00b2, which is roughly the size of New Jersey in the US. <\/p>\n The Casarabe organised into a hierarchy of four different sizes of settlements (those forest islands mentioned above). The biggest ones \u2013 the primary settlements \u2013 were as large as 3km\u00b2 or 300 hectares. That\u2019s enough space for over 400 football pitches, suggesting that they could have accommodated substantial numbers of people. <\/p>\n Welcome to our series on the great mysteries of archaeology.<\/strong> Viking explorers, Amazonian cities, artefacts from before civilisation. Archaeology may be all about the past, but it\u2019s constantly shifting with every scientific discovery. This series will dig into some of the most fascinating debates in the field today.<\/em><\/p>\n These settlements connect along the raised causeways to smaller secondary and tertiary sites a number of kilometres away, all of which were permanently inhabited as opposed to empty ceremonial hubs. A fourth tier consists of groups of isolated mounds located out in the pampas, which likely correspond to dwelling areas occupied by farmers who would have worked the fields. <\/p>\n It\u2019s not possible to show a lidar image of these four different types of sites interconnecting because they are too far apart for the resolution available, but the image below of a primary settlement known as Loma Cotoca shows the kinds of things we are now documenting. <\/p>\n It features some very impressive civic-ceremonial architecture: conical pyramids over 20 metres tall and U-shaped structures that may have acted as areas for public gatherings for speeches or ceremonies. These were built on top of man-made platforms rising as much as five metres off the ground and extending over 20 hectares. To be clear, this is all still hiding under the forest, but the lidar data reveals the shape, height and layout of what lies below. <\/p>\n The volume of earth moved to create this architecture would have rivalled \u2013 and in some cases exceeded \u2013 that of well known Andean monuments such as Akapana<\/a> a few hundred miles to the south-west on the other side of the Andes. Akapana was the epicentre of the Tiwanaku empire that dominated the southern Andes between about AD600 and 1000. <\/p>\n Yet where monuments like Akapana were surrounded by classic, compact bounded cities with thousands of inhabitants, the Casarabe equivalent was completely different. This was dispersed, low-density living amid extensive green space \u2013 a form of tropical urbanism that challenges longstanding assumptions<\/a> about this area as sparsely populated and only lightly modified. It invites comparison with other low-density tropical urban landscapes<\/a> such as the Maya<\/a> in central America and the Angkor<\/a> in latter day Cambodia. <\/p>\n Equally important is the coherence of the Casarabe system. The settlements are rarely isolated, part of a tightly connected network with shared water-management systems. It was clearly all planned and coordinated, designed not only as living spaces but for integrating the population across the region. <\/p>\n We can see that the Casarabe were sustained by drained-field agriculture: the canals were dug to make the land viable for planting during the wet season. The most prominent crop was maize<\/a>, but there was a remarkable diversity of other produce<\/a>. This was all embedded within a landscape that was engineered through reservoirs and farm ponds, which helped the Casarabe sustain cultivation and maintain access to water through the dry season in this extremely seasonal environment. <\/p>\n Also very noticeable is the fact that all the major architectural features and burial sites are oriented north-north-west. This suggests these people may have been led by cosmology, with important celestial bodies or regions of the night sky serving as symbolic reference points \u2013 hinting at a world where infrastructure, settlement and belief were inseparable. <\/p>\n The Casarabe culture covered much less than 1% of Amazonia, which is the whole tropical interior of South America, spanning close to half of the entire continent. For much of the 20th century, this vast area was viewed by archaeologists<\/a> as an environment that was limiting for human existence. <\/p>\n Poor soils, scarce game, extreme El Ni\u00f1o floods and droughts, and the challenges of tropical disease were all thought to constrain human populations to small, wandering groups living off the land as best they could. Large, settled societies \u2013 let alone towns or cities \u2013 were considered unlikely, if not impossible.<\/p>\n This view began to shift in the late 20th century for several reasons. Archaeologists realised<\/a> that Amazonian people had been domesticating<\/a> a diversity of plants since the end of the Ice Age. They manufactured some of the earliest ceramics in the Americas<\/a>, and also devised soils known as Amazonian Dark Earths<\/a>, which combined charcoal, bone and waste materials with the existing poor-quality soil to make it fertile enough for widespread farming. <\/p>\n It also became apparent<\/a> that just like the Casarabe people, many other cultures across Amazonia had reclaimed vast expanses of seasonally flooded savannahs over several thousand years to create raised and drained field systems. <\/p>\n These discoveries were evidence of long-term settlement and landscape management<\/a> far beyond what was previously thought possible. It meant Amazonia was not simply a backdrop to human activity; much of the landscape was shaped over the last 13 millennia<\/a> by the people who lived there.<\/p>\n Like lasers in the sky, lidar technology has accelerated this transformation in our understanding. The digital process feels near-magical, a \u201cvegetation removal algorithm\u201d that reveals the secrets below. <\/p>\n In practice, however, working with lidar in Amazonia is anything but straightforward. Running such a project here, as I have done, can feel like one of the greatest emotional rollercoasters in field archaeology. It\u2019s all anticipation, frustration and sudden revelation \u2013 only comparable, perhaps, with shipwreck exploration. <\/p>\n Depending on what technology is available and most suitable for exploring a particular area, I\u2019ve worked with lidar attached to drones, aeroplanes and helicopters. I\u2019ve learned through trial and error that the technology is only as effective as the logistics and personalities behind it \u2013 above all on one occasion when we were trying to integrate a Hungarian lidar sensor with a Brazilian drone<\/a>. <\/p>\n Lidar can perform beautifully one day and fail the next, depending on the equipment, weather, terrain, batteries, communications and the sheer difficulty of operating in remote Amazonian conditions. <\/p>\n Flights must be carefully planned in remote areas with limited infrastructure, where convective clouds, smoke from fires, wind and even vultures riding thermals can disrupt data acquisition. You have to arrange fuel in advance and improvise landings wherever a safe clearing can be found. Here\u2019s our team refuelling a lidar helicopter in the football field of a small village in Acre state, western Brazil:<\/p>\n You also have to do constant troubleshooting with the technology, such as making sure it\u2019s calibrated correctly and that the data from different flight paths all aligns. What appears in the final images as a seamless \u201cremoval\u201d of the forest is, in reality, the product of improvisation, negotiation and persistence. <\/p>\n But given all these challenges, it makes the first successful images all the more powerful when they finally appear. The reward is that we\u2019re finally finding the \u201clost civilisation\u201d that explorers like Percy Fawcett<\/a> were searching for a century ago, but by cajoling a drone rather than battering through jungle. <\/p>\n Incidentally, this technology also has important uses beyond archaeology. It can help<\/a> people to locate and harvest crops like rubber or a\u00e7a\u00ed palm fruits without having to clear so much rainforest. It is also used by pioneering projects such as Amazonia Revelada<\/a>, which helps Indigenous and traditional people of the Amazon to prove their historic presence within an area to ward off modern commercial interests like loggers or farmers, while also protecting the living history and nature embedded in these landscapes. <\/p>\n Lidar surveys<\/a> by French and Ecuadorian archaeologists have revealed that the Llanos de Moxos was certainly not the only example of large-scale, highly integrated society in Amazonia. The Upano Valley, which covers some 300-600km\u00b2 on the mountainous forest of the Ecuadorian eastern flanks of the Andes, offers another striking example \u2013 this time from between about 500BC and AD600\u2013700. <\/p>\n Lidar discovery areas<\/strong><\/p>\n In Upano, archaeologists<\/a> have been able to map a vast network of settlements connected by extensive road systems, with large platforms and clusters of buildings arranged in organised layouts across a broad area. <\/p>\n What stands out is not just the scale \u2013 thousands of structures \u2013 but the rigour of the planning. The settlements didn\u2019t just grow randomly, but as part of a deliberate design: we see straight lines of flat-topped platforms laid out in repeating rows and connected by straight paths that cut cleanly across the landscape, as you can see below. <\/p>\n Again, this is not urbanism in the conventional sense of dense, continuous occupation. There would have been none of the vertical stacking of buildings that you\u2019d get in European settlements, and there were also green spaces between platform complexes \u2013 much more like a forest city. <\/p>\n Like the Casarabe region, this is a distributed settlement pattern that is both open and highly structured, but the arrangement is much more compact. This reflects the limited flat space available on the upper terraces of the Upano River, which rise up to 100 metres above the surrounding landscape. <\/p>\n Elsewhere in Amazonia, we see more variations. In the Upper Xingu<\/a> of central Brazil, interconnected settlements were arranged around a shared ceremonial and road network, again suggesting a regionally coordinated social world. <\/p>\n Further north, the Tairona people of the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta in present-day Colombia built terraced stone towns in the mountains<\/a>, linked by paved paths. This was a form of urbanism shaped entirely by the demands of steep, high-altitude terrain. Below is a lidar image of one area in this region, with the platforms that would have housed the settlements marked in yellow. Below that, you can see what the platforms look like. <\/p>\n In western Amazonia, Acre adds another important variation. From around AD1\u20131000, people built large ditched enclosures, or geoglyphs, mainly in the south-eastern part of this region along the upper Purus River. These were square, circular, hexagonal or octagonal mounds, often 1-3 hectares in size, with ditches up to four metres deep. These were probably used as ceremonial gathering places rather than permanent settlements. <\/p>\n After about AD1000, these were followed by what we call circular mound villages, occupied until around AD 1650\u20131700. They featured rings of mounds around central plazas and straight roads radiating out like the rays of the Sun, often built to align with the four main compass points. These \u201cSun villages\u201d were true settlements, and formed interconnected networks across the southern rim of Amazonia. You can see an example in the lidar image below. <\/p>\n Taken together, these discoveries fundamentally reshape our understanding of Amazonia. We now see a mosaic of managed landscapes, engineered environments and, in some cases, city-scale societies. What unites them is not a shared blueprint but a shared impulse: the organisation of people, space and movement across large landscapes in ways that were deliberate, durable and distinctly their own.<\/p>\n To stress, Amazonia was not uniformly dense or urban. It supported a diversity of types of settlements, from dispersed networks like Moxos to tighter grids like Upano, each of them adapted to local ecological conditions. They shared a low-density urbanism, in the sense of large, interconnected populations without the density of classic cities. <\/p>\n How were these societies organised politically and socially? How did they interact with variations in the climate and environment, ranging from the heavy rainfalls and droughts caused by El Ni\u00f1o to rivers forging new routes that could move them away from a settlement within a few generations?<\/p>\n What, if any, connections existed with mountain societies in the Andes? And perhaps most importantly, since both the Casarabe and Upano ceased to build monuments after 1492, what led to their transformation or decline before the arrival of Europeans? <\/p>\n There is active debate<\/a> between archaeologists over whether these societies transformed because of environmental stress, internal political change, or shifts in things like trade routes or migration. <\/p>\n In the Llanos de Moxos, one possibility is that a prolonged period of climate change affected the Casarabe water-management systems that were so critical to feeding this thriving society. In the Upano Valley, volcanic eruptions and earthquakes may have disrupted settlements and agriculture, although it\u2019s unclear whether that could have led to the area being abandoned. <\/p>\n It seems likely that as we uncover new things, it will reveal more and more integration between different societies. What we are seeing now in Amazonia is much like looking at a satellite image of a country at night: bright, isolated clusters of light \u2013 cities that appear disconnected. But as we continue to expand our coverage and fill in the gaps, I think this will change<\/a>. <\/p>\n What now appear as isolated clusters may also resolve into extensive networks. For example a study<\/a> across the southern rim of Amazonia has predicted that the kinds of settlement mounds that have been identified so far are likely to occur across about 400,000km\u00b2, supporting an estimated regional population of roughly 500,000 to 1 million people in the era before the Europeans arrived. <\/p>\n Entire regions may emerge as previously unrecognised centres of population and landscape management. This could be particularly so for the Llanos de Moxos. The whole area covers as much as 200,000km\u00b2, depending on where you draw the boundaries, stretching into Brazil and even Peru. It is often divided into several apparently distinct cultural regions \u2014 the Casarabe (aka the monumental mound region), and then two others called the platform ridge and zanjas<\/em> (ditches) regions. <\/p>\n As lidar coverage expands and more archaeological work is conducted, we may begin to understand how these societies were economically specialised. We know, for example, that the fortified villages of the zanjas<\/em> region had fish weirs<\/a> spanning hundreds of miles that were capable of capturing vast quantities of migratory fish. The platform ridge region consisted of large drained fields, which could potentially produce surpluses of maize. It is conceivable that these belonged to a broader network that supported the more complex Casarabe centres. <\/p>\n Or perhaps \u2013 who knows \u2013 the relationships were more fluid and reciprocal. For now, the question remains open. But it is precisely this possibility of deep regional integration that lidar is beginning to bring into view. In time, we may even begin to identify Casarabe outposts scattered across the Llanos de Moxos.<\/p>\n There\u2019s still a huge amount to be done with lidar. Vast areas, particularly in the Ecuadorian and Peruvian Amazon \u2013 remain unexplored. One recent study<\/a> suggested that there could be more than 10,000 more urban structures of the kind I\u2019ve been describing still hidden throughout Amazonia, all of them dating from pre-European times. <\/p>\n Looking ahead 20 years, it is likely that our map of Amazonia will look very different. One promising technology is satellite-based lidar systems, which could provide broader, though less detailed, datasets across large areas. Advances in machine learning are also beginning to help us identify archaeological features within massive datasets, speeding up a labour-intensive process. <\/p>\n Against this, there are time pressures in some places. Llanos de Moxos, for instance, is unfortunately in rapid transition<\/a>. The very ground that holds the traces of ancient networks is being transformed by mechanised agriculture and large-scale terraforming for rice cultivation and pastures.<\/p>\n We also need to keep reminding ourselves that lidar is only the first step. What really matters is how it\u2019s brought together with other lines of evidence. Most sites discovered by lidar have yet to be excavated, so we\u2019ll have to do much of that, looking for everything from bones and plants to ceramics and weapons. <\/p>\n So far, most excavation has been in the Casarabe area of the Llanos de Moxos. The reason, for instance, that we know the culture lived primarily on maize was through the discovery<\/a> of over 60 human skeletons, which underwent carbon isotope analysis. The same research paper also analysed excavated duck bones to show that the Casarabe were feeding them maize too, suggesting animal domestication in a continent that was not generally known for it. <\/p>\n Another fascinating Casarabe find<\/a> is a single buried skeleton who may have been a leader, because he had a collar of jaguar teeth around his neck. He was also wearing ear pieces made of armadillo shell, studded with mottled blue stones called sodalite \u2013 it\u2019s not clear what these were for. <\/p>\n We\u2019ll also need to obtain more precise dates for key events using techniques like radiocarbon dating, and more pinpoint accurate environmental data to help support theories about ancient changes to the climate \u2013 as opposed to the wider regional information we\u2019ve tended to rely on until now. Lake sediments are great environmental archives, preserving evidence of things like vegetation change and landscape disturbance. <\/p>\n Also important is comparing genetic data from excavated bones with people who live in these areas today \u2013 in dialogue and collaboration with local communities whose histories, memories and knowledge are essential to understanding these landscapes. <\/p>\n It\u2019s all a question of how lidar is brought together with all this other evidence. The most convincing reconstructions will come from the convergence of all of these. One further major challenge ahead, however, will be to bridge the gap between scientific reconstructions and how past peoples understood and inhabited their world. Archaeology is increasingly rich in data, but we have to relate it to lived experience.<\/p>\n That is no easy feat, but it is essential if we are to move from mapping past worlds to understanding them. Crucially, Amazonia \u2013 with its rich, still-vibrant Indigenous societies and ethnographic record \u2013 offers an exceptional opportunity to do this, providing rare continuities through which to anchor and critically engage our interpretations of the past.<\/p>\n My own sense is that we will move towards a view of Amazonia not as an exception, in line with the old view that the people lived within an untouched paradise, but as part of a broader pattern of human-environment interaction. The rainforest will be understood not only as a biological system, but as a historical one \u2013 shaped, in part, by the people who lived within it.<\/p>\n This does not mean the Amazonian people who simply lived \u201cin harmony\u201d with nature; the evidence points to something more interesting. Although Amazonian societies developed complex, and at times intensive, forms of land use, the evidence consistently shows<\/a> that they often did so while maintaining continuous forest cover. Far from the large-scale deforestation that we might assume was necessary for such elaborate forms of human life, their practices created mosaics of managed forest, gardens, orchards, wetlands and settlement areas. <\/p>\n We know partly from lake sediment data that people enriched<\/a> the forests with species that provided food, building materials, medicines and other resources, from a\u00e7a\u00ed and cacao to palms, cinchona and copaiba. The fact that some of these species endure today suggests that past land use left lasting ecological legacies. <\/p>\n In the context of today\u2019s climate crisis, the long-term balance that these people achieved offers a powerful lesson: it is possible to sustain complex societies without destroying the forest, if land use is guided by principles that integrate ecological knowledge, cultural values and a commitment to the continuity of the living landscape.<\/p>\n What lies beneath the Amazon is not just a hidden past. It is a reminder that even the most seemingly untouched landscapes can carry deep histories, waiting \u2013 sometimes just beneath our feet \u2013 to be revealed.<\/p>\n This article features references to books that have been included for editorial reasons, and may contain links to bookshop.org. If you click on one of the links and go on to buy something from bookshop.org The Conversation UK may earn a commission.<\/em><\/p>\n For you: more from our Insights series<\/a>:<\/em><\/p>\n Underground data fortresses: the nuclear bunkers, mines and mountains being transformed to protect our \u2018new gold\u2019 from attack \u2018People think you come out \u2026 and live happily ever after. If only.\u2019 The reality of life after wrongful conviction The grief myth: it doesn\u2019t come in stages or follow a checklist \u2013 like love, it endures<\/a>
\n Jose Iriarte<\/span>, CC BY-SA<\/a><\/span>
\n <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
\n<\/a>
\n<\/a>
\n Jose Iriarte<\/span>, CC BY-SA<\/a><\/span>
\n <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/a>
\n Wikimedia<\/a>, CC BY-SA<\/a><\/span>
\n <\/figcaption><\/figure>\nRethinking the Amazon<\/h2>\n
Enter lidar<\/h2>\n
<\/a>
\n Jose Iriarte<\/span>, CC BY-SA<\/a><\/span>
\n <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/a>
\n Wikimedia<\/a>, CC BY-SA<\/a><\/span>
\n <\/figcaption><\/figure>\nOther lidar discoveries<\/h2>\n
<\/a>
\n Felt<\/a>, CC BY-SA<\/a><\/span>
\n <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/a>
\n Jose Iriarte<\/span>, CC BY-SA<\/a><\/span>
\n <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/a>
\n Daniel Osorio<\/span>, CC BY-SA<\/a><\/span>
\n <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/a>
\n Jose Iriarte<\/span>, CC BY-SA<\/a><\/span>
\n <\/figcaption><\/figure>\nWhat we still don\u2019t know<\/h2>\n
What happens next<\/h2>\n
<\/a>
\n Heiko Pr\u00fcmers\/Jose Iriarte<\/span>, CC BY-SA<\/a><\/span>
\n <\/figcaption><\/figure>\nLessons for today<\/h2>\n
<\/a>
\n Guentermanaus<\/a><\/span>
\n <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
\n\n
\n<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<\/li>\n
\n<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<\/li>\n
\n<\/a><\/em><\/p>\n<\/li>\n
![Wikimedia<\/a>,](\"https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Tiwanaku_-_panoramio_%283%29.jpg\"){kind=link}
![Wikimedia<\/a>,](\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Percy_Fawcett#\/media\/File:PercyFawcett.jpg\"){kind=link}