{"id":1163,"date":"2026-07-22T14:38:40","date_gmt":"2026-07-22T14:38:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/redzine.co.uk\/index.php\/2026\/07\/22\/soft-plastic-recycling-laws-have-been-delayed-an-expert-explains-why\/"},"modified":"2026-07-22T14:38:40","modified_gmt":"2026-07-22T14:38:40","slug":"soft-plastic-recycling-laws-have-been-delayed-an-expert-explains-why","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/redzine.co.uk\/index.php\/2026\/07\/22\/soft-plastic-recycling-laws-have-been-delayed-an-expert-explains-why\/","title":{"rendered":"Soft plastic recycling laws have been delayed \u2013 an expert explains why"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/749069\/original\/file-20260721-70-vdmscz.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.1&amp;rect=297%2C0%2C3213%2C2142&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=1050&amp;h=700&amp;fit=crop\" \/><figcaption><span class=\"caption\"><\/span> <span class=\"attribution\"><a class=\"source\" href=\"https:\/\/www.shutterstock.com\/image-photo\/problem-plastic-shopping-bag-pollution-2476992921\">RymanStudio\/Shutterstock<\/a><\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Mandatory kerbside collection of soft plastic (crisp packets, bread bags, plastic wrap) has just been pushed back from 2027 to 2030. <\/p>\n<p>On July 16, the UK government\u2019s Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) quietly confirmed this change. The reason, according to Defra, is that the facilities and infrastructure just aren\u2019t ready to accommodate the material. Currently, only <a href=\"https:\/\/www.wrap.ngo\/resources\/guide\/creating-circular-economy-flexible-plastic-packaging\">7% soft plastics are recycled in the UK<\/a>, illustrating that <a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/topics\/recycling-1581\">recycling<\/a> urgently needs improving and simplifying.<\/p>\n<p>Earlier in 2026, many Brits were left confused when mandatory weekly food waste collection legislation came into effect. Months since that change, one-quarter <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bbc.com\/news\/articles\/cn4vwj0yj20o\">of councils are still not meeting the requirements<\/a>.  <\/p>\n<p>With soft plastics, the government has moved its own deadlines by three years when the system genuinely isn\u2019t ready. But households didn\u2019t get that option.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/news\/simpler-household-recycling-rules-come-into-force-across-england\">Simpler recycling rules<\/a> were introduced through the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.legislation.gov.uk\/ukpga\/2021\/30\/contents\">2021 Environment Act<\/a> to streamline the number of bins households are required to separate their waste into, provide frequent food waste collections and introduce plastic films into standard recycling streams. The goal is to make our lives easier and recycling processes more efficient.<\/p>\n<p>But the waste itself keeps arriving. For the first time in history items are being produced with the <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.55845\/jos-2026-2132\">sole purpose of being thrown away<\/a>. Every week in the UK we throw away an estimated <a href=\"https:\/\/thebigplasticcount.com\/\">1.6 billion pieces of plastic packaging<\/a>, mostly food and drink packaging.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/commonslibrary.parliament.uk\/research-briefings\/cbp-10352\/\">Extended producer responsibility for packaging<\/a> (pEPR) is a UK government scheme that charges producers fees based on the packaging they put on the market. Run by a scheme administrator that operates within Defra called <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/organisations\/packuk\">PackUK<\/a>, this is built on the polluter pays principle: the idea that whoever creates the problem should fund the fix, not the public. <\/p>\n<p>That should mean producers are financially responsible for helping us deal with what they sell us. In practice, there\u2019s a mismatch. The <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/publications\/extended-producer-responsibility-for-packaging-2025-base-fees\/extended-producer-responsibility-for-packaging-2025-base-fees\">pEPR fees are charged per tonne<\/a>, so lighter packaging is cheaper to report, regardless of whether it\u2019s actually easier to recycle. <\/p>\n<p>Take a pack of mince: switching from a rigid plastic tray to a flexible pouch can lower a producer\u2019s pEPR fee exposure, even though the flexible pouch is the one material stream the UK still can\u2019t recycle at scale. <\/p>\n<figure class=\"align-center zoomable\">\n            <a aria-label=\"Zoomable image\" href=\"https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/749075\/original\/file-20260721-57-4j34x0.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.1&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=1000&amp;fit=clip\"><img decoding=\"async\" alt=\"meat mince in plastic package, hand lifting packet from fridge of supermarket meats\" src=\"https:\/\/images.theconversation.com\/files\/749075\/original\/file-20260721-57-4j34x0.jpg?ixlib=rb-4.1.1&amp;q=45&amp;auto=format&amp;w=754&amp;fit=clip\"><\/a><figcaption>\n              <span class=\"caption\">Mince meat has traditionally been packed in rigid plastic trays but some suppliers are switching to flexible plastic pouches.<\/span><br \/>\n              <span class=\"attribution\"><a class=\"source\" href=\"https:\/\/www.shutterstock.com\/image-photo\/plastic-packaging-pork-minced-meat-store-2405472617\">Sergey Ryzhov\/Shutterstock<\/a><\/span><br \/>\n            <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Producers are being financially nudged toward exactly the material stream the government has just admitted it can\u2019t process.<\/p>\n<p>Now it is the public\u2019s problem to solve, one supermarket trip at a time. Drop-off schemes at certain supermarkets are quietly doing more heavy lifting than they get credit for, taking soft plastic off householders\u2019 hands without asking them to store yet another separate bag, and taking on the downstream cost of dealing with it themselves. Although in some cases, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/environment\/2024\/oct\/01\/soft-plastic-collected-for-recycling-burned-tesco-sainsburys-campaigners\">your efforts may be in vain<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The same tension is coming for absorbent hygiene waste (nappies, period products, wet wipes). None of these can be collected in food or dry recycling streams so they now compete for space in a residual black bin. According to my calculations based on waste collection frequency <a href=\"https:\/\/laportal.wrap.ngo\/uk\/\">data from environmental charity Wrap<\/a>, more than half of England households only have their black bins collected fortnightly.<\/p>\n<h2>What are polluters paying for?<\/h2>\n<p>And the money that\u2019s supposed to close this gap? Earlier this year, after several delays PackUK <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/publications\/epr-for-packaging-how-local-authority-payments-are-calculated\/local-authority-payment-values-england\">paid councils \u00a31.4 billion in producer collected fees<\/a>. But that funding is not ringfenced for waste services. PackUK\u2019s only real lever if a council spends it elsewhere is a vague threat to claw back future allocations. <\/p>\n<p>Given how short an electoral cycle is, and how much easier it is to point to a visible win today than a waste truck bought two years from now, that isn\u2019t much of an incentive. <\/p>\n<p>Councils are being held to a stringent standard when PackUK is still struggling to get clean, consistent tonnage <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/news\/year-1-extended-producer-responsibility-for-packaging-fees-update\">data out of producers in the scheme\u2019s first year<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>The uncomfortable truth is that our <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.wasman.2026.115465\">whole system is built to reward recyclability<\/a>. But recycling is really not a circular solution. Most plastics can only be recycled a few times <a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/why-plastic-bottles-now-have-their-caps-attached-239886\">before they become too brittle to be useful<\/a>. <\/p>\n<p>What actually matters is how much we\u2019re manufacturing in the first place. So while we were told to sort our recycling, it\u2019s now time producers are told to stop producing excess packaging that ends up being thrown out.<\/p>\n<p>So next time you\u2019re unwrapping something, ask not just \u201ccan this be recycled\u201d but \u201cdid it need to exist in this form at all\u201d. Policy needs to stop treating recyclability as the finish line and start pricing packaging on what it actually costs the places that have to deal with it, <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1016\/j.jclepro.2025.145069\">weighted by real harm<\/a>, not just by weight on a scale.<\/p>\n<p>Producers need to be held to the same standard of urgency that the government is demanding of households. And we, as shoppers and citizens, can start by refusing to accept that convenience for a company should mean inconvenience, or a dirtier street, for us.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/counter.theconversation.com\/content\/287907\/count.gif\" alt=\"The Conversation\" width=\"1\" height=\"1\" \/><\/p>\n<p class=\"fine-print\"><em><span>Randa Lindsey Kachef does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>RymanStudio\/Shutterstock Mandatory kerbside collection of soft plastic (crisp packets, bread bags, plastic wrap) has just been pushed back from 2027 to 2030. On July 16, the UK government\u2019s Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) quietly confirmed this change. The reason, according to Defra, is that the facilities and infrastructure just aren\u2019t ready to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1163","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/redzine.co.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1163","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/redzine.co.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/redzine.co.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/redzine.co.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/redzine.co.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1163"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/redzine.co.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1163\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/redzine.co.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1163"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/redzine.co.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1163"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/redzine.co.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1163"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}