But the irony is that this late collapse has stitched another thread of continuity into the long tapestry of England\u2019s footballing heritage.<\/p>\n
As a researcher of cultural heritage, I\u2019ve always thought of football as so much more than the results on the pitch. Indeed, what makes the beautiful game such a powerful cultural phenomenon are the stories supporters inherit and pass on. The things that connect fans to team.<\/p>\n
Long before most people fully understand the tactics or even the rules of the game, they begin learning its narratives. They hear about legendary players, miraculous victories, controversial refereeing decisions and \u2013 especially in the case of England \u2013 devastating defeats. Over time, these a form a shared cultural inheritance.<\/a> <\/p>\n This is why football can be understood as a form of living heritage. Heritage is not confined to castles, monuments or museum collections. It also exists in intangible things<\/a> too like traditions that communities continually recreate and transmit from one generation to the next.<\/p>\n Football support works in precisely this way. Every generation inherits a repertoire of stories before adding new chapters of its own and passing them on again. Football culture is thus sustained by an ongoing conversation between past, present and future.<\/p>\n These stories have a vital cultural function. They create identities<\/a> by giving supporters \u2013 and players \u2013 a shared understanding of who they are. They bind strangers into communities through common memories and references. And they provide continuity, allowing football cultures to evolve without losing their sense of themselves.<\/p>\n Football matches come and go. The stories endure. It is those stories, continually retold and reinterpreted, that transform football from entertainment into one of Britain\u2019s most powerful forms of living heritage.<\/p>\n Nowhere is this clearer than in England\u2019s relationship with its men\u2019s national team and in the never ending quest for football to finally \u201ccome home\u201d<\/a>. England\u2019s defining story is not simply one of repeated failure, but of a peculiar cycle in which hope and disappointment continually reproduce one another.<\/p>\n Each generation inherits the emotional landmarks of previous tournaments. Of course there is the totemic memory of 1966 when England won the World Cup at Wembley Stadium. But the country\u2019s subsequent experiences of heartbreak loom even larger in the collective imagination.<\/p>\n They are painfully memorable. Gazza\u2019s tears in Turin<\/a> in 1990 when a yellow card in a semi meant Paul Gascoigne wouldn\u2019t be able to play in the final. The various penalty shoot-out defeats, and the unfulfilled promise of the \u201cgolden generation\u201d<\/a> of England\u2019s 2006 World Cup team. And of course, the recent near misses under Gareth Southgate, as England have contrived to find ever more creative ways to miss out on a second major trophy.<\/p>\n Crucially, this tragic inheritance has not produced a culture of resignation or cynicism. Instead, every tournament begins with the same familiar ritual. Supporters convince themselves that the draw has opened up, that this squad is different, that this manager has found the answer. They do so partly in earnest and partly with a knowing smile, fully aware there is likely heartbreak to come.<\/p>\n For all the criticism it attracts<\/a> \u2013 particularly abroad as an expression of arrogance in England\u2019s self-perception as founder and home of modern football \u2013 the idea of football coming home is actually couched in a deep self-awareness. It is an expression of belief against the evidence, of an ability to hope despite knowing how the story will end.<\/p>\n
![\"The](\"https:\/\/counter.theconversation.com\/content\/287702\/count.gif\")
<\/p>\n