{"id":1094,"date":"2026-07-16T11:12:14","date_gmt":"2026-07-16T11:12:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/redzine.co.uk\/index.php\/2026\/07\/16\/why-some-primates-have-even-tougher-births-than-humans\/"},"modified":"2026-07-16T11:12:14","modified_gmt":"2026-07-16T11:12:14","slug":"why-some-primates-have-even-tougher-births-than-humans","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/redzine.co.uk\/index.php\/2026\/07\/16\/why-some-primates-have-even-tougher-births-than-humans\/","title":{"rendered":"Why some primates have even tougher births than humans"},"content":{"rendered":"
Having a baby is no joke for tamarins. <\/span> Martin Leber\/Shutterstock<\/a><\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Scientists have long thought humans have a uniquely difficult birth compared to other primates. <\/p>\n

And it\u2019s true that from an evolutionary perspective, we face an obstetrical dilemma<\/a>. As we evolved to walk on two feet, our pelvis changed shape and size and our birth canal became smaller and oddly twisted. Meanwhile, the evolution of our enormous brain meant that a large-headed baby needed to fit through it.<\/p>\n

But our new study<\/a> found that some primates have to give birth to babies that are squashed even more tightly in the birth canal. <\/p>\n

Primate births usually happen at night which makes them difficult to study, especially in the wild. Because of this, we do not know much about them. Rare observations suggest a more solitary, shorter and less noisy labour<\/a> compared to humans. <\/p>\n

To get around this lack of direct observations, in 1949, the Swiss anthropologist Adolph H. Schultz looked for clues in anatomy<\/a> instead. He measured the size of the pelvic birth canal and of the neonatal head in humans and seven other primates. He wanted to find out how tightly the baby\u2019s head fitted through the birth canal. His results suggested that humans were unique in having a rounder birth canal, one in which the baby\u2019s head only just fitted through. Other great apes seemed to have an oval canal with plenty of space for the baby\u2019s head. Schultz\u2019s influential study shaped how we think about human birth as unusual and harder than other primates.<\/p>\n

However, the way he measured the birth canal was based on human anatomy. And the human standard measure Schultz used did not actually reflect how much space there was. He used the distance between the top of the sacrum (a large triangular bone at the base of the spine) and the top of the pubis bone to represent the diameter of the canal (a standard obstetric measurement in humans). Since the sacrum sits higher in the pelvis in other primates, only its lower part forms part of their birth canal. This is why their birth canals appeared so elongated in his diagram.<\/p>\n

Our study<\/a> instead used 3D scans of the pelvis and measurements of the newborn head from 29 primate species, including humans, to revisit Schultz\u2019s study using more appropriate measurements. We found that, in reality, many primates experience a much tighter fit than humans do.<\/p>\n

Some of the most striking examples were squirrel monkeys and tamarins, small
\nprimates from Central and South America that live high in the tree canopy. Their
\nbabies are born with heads that are about double the size of the maternal pelvic
\ncanal.<\/p>\n

\n \"Small
\n Squirrel monkeys have a tight fit at birth.<\/span>
\n dangdumrong\/Shutterstock<\/a><\/span>
\n <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Birth for squirrel monkeys and tamarins might seem impossible with such a
\nhead-to-pelvis disproportion, but a 1995 study<\/a> provides an explanation. After many
\nsleepless nights spent observing squirrel monkeys giving birth in a primate centre, doctoral researcher Melissa Stoller managed to take X-ray images of the labour, revealing that the monkey\u2019s pelvic bones temporarily dislocate, creating extra space for the baby to pass through. We think a similar strategy may help bushbabies, whose newborns also have unusually large heads relative to the mother\u2019s birth canal. As we showed in a 2025 study<\/a>, the pelvis of female bushbabies (but not males) is open at the front, where their pubic bones do not meet and elastic connective tissue between them can stretch and expand during labour.<\/p>\n

Another adaptation concerns the way the baby moves through the birth canal. In
\nthese species, babies usually enter the canal face-first rather than with the top of the head (the orientation assumed by Schultz in his diagrams). This reduces the amount of space needed during birth. Stoller\u2019s X-ray study showed this in squirrel monkeys and baboons, and it may be common in other monkey species<\/a> too.<\/p>\n

Neither of these adaptations could be easily adopted by humans. Because we walk
\nupright, our pelvis must provide stable support to our body and cannot easily stretch during labour. In fact, when the pelvic ring dilates too much<\/a> during birth, this can lead to severe pelvic pain, and difficulty in walking after the birth. Instead, our babies have evolved a highly plastic head that can mould to the shape<\/a> of the maternal birth canal as it passes through it.<\/p>\n

The dangers of giving birth<\/h2>\n

Giving birth is neither easy nor risk free. Despite huge medical advances, we still see three maternal deaths<\/a> per 1,000 live births worldwide, and more in low-income or war-torn countries. Birth is even riskier for babies, with 17 deaths<\/a> per 1,000 live births in sub-saharan Africa. Maternal mortality rates were much higher<\/a> a hundred years ago, before antibiotics and advances in obstetric care. <\/p>\n

\n \"Golden
\n Spare a thought for tamarin mothers.<\/span>
\n Martens Coyotes\/Shutterstock<\/a><\/span>
\n <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

While these adaptations make birth possible, they do not necessarily make it easy.
\nGoing back to squirrel monkeys, despite their flexible pelvis they have high maternal and foetal<\/a> mortality.<\/p>\n

Looking even more widely across mammals, there are many examples of unique adaptations for apparently impossible births; from female bats having evolved a pelvic girdle fully open at the front<\/a> so the pelvis is more of a horseshoe structure to accommodate enormous babies, to spotted hyenas having to give birth through their extremely large clitoris<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Primates, and mammals at large, show a diversity of obstetrical dilemmas, each
\nsolved in different ways depending on their anatomy, ecology and movement. If we
\nare unique, so are all other species.<\/p>\n

\"The<\/p>\n

Lia Betti received funding from the Leverhulme Trust and the Great Britain Sasakawa Foundation. <\/span><\/em><\/p>\n

Nicole Torres Tamayo is currently working as a researcher at the Institut Catal\u00e0 de Paleontologia Miquel Crusafont (ICP-CERCA). She is affiliated with the Department of Anthropology of University College London and the Institute of Evolutionary Medicine od the University of Zurich.<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Having a baby is no joke for tamarins. Martin Leber\/Shutterstock Scientists have long thought humans have a uniquely difficult birth compared to other primates. And it\u2019s true that from an evolutionary perspective, we face an obstetrical dilemma. As we evolved to walk on two feet, our pelvis changed shape and size and our birth canal […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1094","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/redzine.co.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1094","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/redzine.co.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/redzine.co.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/redzine.co.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/redzine.co.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1094"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/redzine.co.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1094\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/redzine.co.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1094"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/redzine.co.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1094"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/redzine.co.uk\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1094"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}